When given the same input item $B$ processes each return either T or F. The probability that process $S_i$, $1 <= i <= B$, returns T is $p_i$, and this probability is independent of any other process. What is the expected probability that two or more processes return F for the same input item?
This is a probability problem involving independent Bernoulli trials. Let me analyze it step by step.
Understanding the Problem
We have B independent processes, where:
- Process Si returns T with probability pi
- Process Si returns F with probability qi=1−pi
We want the expected probability that two or more processes return F for the same input.
Wait - since the probabilities pi are fixed (not random variables), the probability we're looking for is actually a deterministic value, not an expectation in the statistical sense. The phrase "expected probability" likely just means "what is the probability."
Solution Approach
It's easier to use the complement rule:
P(2 or more F’s)=1−P(0 F’s)−P(exactly 1 F)
Step 1: Probability of 0 F's (all T's)
P(all T)=∏i=1Bpi
Step 2: Probability of exactly 1 F
This means exactly one process returns F and the rest return T:
P(exactly 1 F)=∑j=1Bqj∏i=jpi=∑j=1Bpjqj∏i=1Bpi
Or equivalently:
P(exactly 1 F)=(∏i=1Bpi)∑j=1Bpj1−pj
Step 3: Final Answer
P(2 or more F’s)=1−i=1∏Bpi−j=1∑Bqji=j∏pi
Or in expanded form:
=1−∏i=1Bpi(1+∑j=1Bpj1−pj)
Alternative Expression
If we define Q=∏i=1Bpi , then:
P(2 or more F’s)=1−Q−Q∑j=1Bpjqj=1−Q(1+∑j=1Bpjqj)
Special Case: Equal Probabilities
If all pi=p (so qi=q=1−p for all i ):
- P(0 F’s)=pB
- P(exactly 1 F)=(1B)qpB−1=BqpB−1
P(2 or more F’s)=1−pB−BqpB−1=1−pB−1(p+Bq)
Or using the binomial distribution directly:
=∑k=2B(kB)qkpB−k
This is the standard binomial tail probability.
When $N$ independent input items have been processed, what is the mean and variance of the number of input items where at least two processes returned F?
I need to find the mean and variance of the number of items (out of N independent items) where at least two processes return F.
Setup
Let me define for each input item n (where n=1,2,…,N ):
- Xn=1 if at least 2 processes return F for item n , and Xn=0 otherwise.
The total count is:
Y=∑n=1NXn
Finding the Distribution of Xn
From the previous problem, for a single item:
p=P(Xn=1)=P(at least 2 F’s)=1−∏i=1Bpi−∑j=1Bqj∏i=jpi
where qj=1−pj .
So Xn∼Bernoulli(p) , and since items are independent:
Y∼Binomial(N,p)
Mean of Y
For a Binomial distribution:
E[Y]=Np=N1−i=1∏Bpi−j=1∑Bqji=j∏pi
Variance of Y
For a Binomial distribution:
Var(Y)=Np(1−p)=N1−i=1∏Bpi−j=1∑Bqji=j∏pii=1∏Bpi+j=1∑Bqji=j∏pi
Simplified Notation
Let me define:
- P0=∏i=1Bpi (probability all T)
- P1=∑j=1Bqj∏i=jpi (probability exactly 1 F)
Then:
- p=1−P0−P1 (probability of at least 2 F's)
- 1−p=P0+P1 (probability of 0 or 1 F)
So:
E[Y]=N(1−P0−P1)
Var(Y)=N(1−P0−P1)(P0+P1)
Special Case: Equal Probabilities
If all pi=p and q=1−p :
- P0=pB
- P1=BqpB−1
Then:
E[Y]=N(1−pB−BqpB−1)=N(1−pB−1(p+Bq))
Var(Y)=N(1−pB−BqpB−1)(pB+BqpB−1)
List methods of obtaining confidence intervals when $p_i$ is very close to 1
When pi≈1 (so qi=1−pi≈0 ), we're dealing with rare events (few F's). This is the "high reliability" regime where failures are uncommon. Here are the main methods for constructing confidence intervals in this setting:
1. Standard Wald Interval (Often Poor Here)
p^±zα/2Np^(1−p^)
Problem: When p≈1 , if we observe few failures, p^ can be exactly 1, giving zero-width intervals. The normal approximation fails for extreme probabilities with moderate N .
2. Wilson Score Interval (Better)
1+Nz2p^+2Nz2±zNp^(1−p^)+4N2z2
- Works better than Wald for extreme p
- Always gives intervals inside [0,1]
- Good for p≈1 with reasonable N
3. Clopper-Pearson (Exact) Interval
Based on the binomial CDF, solving:
∑k=yN(kN)pLk(1−pL)N−k=α/2
∑k=0y(kN)pUk(1−pU)N−k=α/2
- Guarantees coverage probability ≥1−α
- Conservative (wider than necessary)
- Computationally intensive but reliable
4. Agresti-Coull Interval (Adjusted Wald)
Add "pseudo-observations": N~=N+z2 , y~=y+z2/2
p~±zN~p~(1−p~)
- Better coverage than Wald near boundaries
- Simple to compute
5. Bayesian Credible Intervals (Highly Recommended)
Beta prior + Binomial likelihood → Beta posterior
For p≈1 , use Jeffreys prior: Beta(1/2,1/2) or informative prior concentrated near 1.
Posterior: Beta(y+1/2,N−y+1/2)
Credible interval from quantiles of Beta distribution.
6. Poisson Approximation (For Very Rare F's)
When pi≈1 so qi≈0 , and N is large:
If Y= count of items with ≥2 F's, and p=P(≥2 F’s)≈0 :
Y≈Poisson(λ=Np)
Confidence interval for λ : λL,λU from Poisson tables, then scale back.
7. Logit Transformation (Variance Stabilizing)
logit(p^)=ln(1−p^p^)≈N(logit(p),Np(1−p)1)
CI for logit(p) , then transform back. Better for p≈0 or 1 .
8. Bootstrap Methods
- Percentile bootstrap: Resample data, compute p^∗ for each sample, use percentiles
- BCa (bias-corrected accelerated): More accurate, adjusts for skewness
9. Likelihood Ratio Interval
Solve:
−2ln(L(p^)L(p))≤χ12(α)
Where L(p)=py(1−p)N−y . More accurate than Wald, especially near boundaries.
10. Rule of Three (Conservative, Quick)
If you observe y=0 events in N trials:
pU≈N3
For one-sided upper bound on rare event rate.
Recommendations for pi≈1
表格
复制
| Scenario | Recommended Method |
|---|---|
| Small N (<30 ) | Clopper-Pearson or Bayesian with Beta prior |
| Moderate N | Wilson score or Agresti-Coull |
| Large N , very rare failures | Poisson approximation |
| Need exact coverage | Clopper-Pearson |
| Prior information available | Bayesian credible intervals |
| Computational flexibility | Bootstrap (BCa preferred) |
Special Note for Your Problem
When pi≈1 , the probability p=P(≥2 F’s) involves products of small qi 's:
- P0=∏pi≈1−∑qi (very close to 1)
- P1=∑qj∏i=jpi≈∑qj (small)
- p=1−P0−P1≈0 (very small!)
So you're estimating a very small probability from binomial data. The Poisson approximation or Bayesian methods with informative priors are particularly valuable here.