f(Q), Myrzakulov, and f(T) Gravity Report

Compare f(Q), Myrzakulov, and f(T) gravity without treating a model preference as cosmological consensus. Confirm the notation and model classes from peer-reviewed papers and standard reviews: define Q as the non-metricity scalar in symmetric teleparallel formulations, T as the torsion scalar in teleparallel formulations, and state precisely which Myrzakulov construction each source studies rather than treating the name as one fixed theory. Reconstruct actions, assumptions, field equations, background solutions, perturbation conditions, and claimed consistency issues from primary literature. Keep mathematical derivation, model-dependent result, observational fit, selection-criterion comparison, and speculation in separate layers. Check dark-energy and dark-matter claims against the datasets, parameterizations, priors, perturbation analyses, and baselines actually used; do not infer elimination of dark components from a background-era saddle point or label an active framework a new standard model.

Deliver a notation and model taxonomy, derivation ledger, assumption-to-equation map, observation table with datasets and statistical criteria, and a claim audit comparing the source page with the literature. Show unresolved covariance, stability, local-gravity, structure-growth, and model-selection questions. Cite equations by source and version, expose disputed terminology such as any alleged partial-integration problem, and conclude with supported findings, model-contingent findings, and open conjectures.

Compare f(Q), Myrzakulov, and f(T) gravity without treating a model preference as cosmological consensus. Confirm the notation and model classes from peer-reviewed papers and standard reviews: define Q as the non-metricity scalar in symmetric teleparallel formulations, T as the torsion scalar in teleparallel formulations, and state precisely which Myrzakulov construction each source studies rather than treating the name as one fixed theory. Reconstruct actions, assumptions, field equations, background solutions, perturbation conditions, and claimed consistency issues from primary literature. Keep mathematical derivation, model-dependent result, observational fit, selection-criterion comparison, and speculation in separate layers. Check dark-energy and dark-matter claims against the datasets, parameterizations, priors, perturbation analyses, and baselines actually used; do not infer elimination of dark components from a background-era saddle point or label an active framework a new standard model.

Deliver a notation and model taxonomy, derivation ledger, assumption-to-equation map, observation table with datasets and statistical criteria, and a claim audit comparing the source page with the literature. Show unresolved covariance, stability, local-gravity, structure-growth, and model-selection questions. Cite equations by source and version, expose disputed terminology such as any alleged partial-integration problem, and conclude with supported findings, model-contingent findings, and open conjectures.